2/2 left

BRK-B stock verdict - Value

BRK-B
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC
VALUEFinancial Services
$505.48 Levels unreliable (peak earnings?) — verify manually
⚠️ Earnings-multiple levels suppressed — the model fair value is implausibly far above the market price (likely cyclical-peak or one-off earnings). Judge this name manually.
VALUE100
GROWTH19
QUALITY59
TECHNICAL—
TRUST SCORE
76High
confidence in this read — data completeness, earnings quality & coverage
Technicals: insufficient price history
PROS
  • Attractive trailing P/E of 0.0× (earnings yield 18022.3%)
  • Stock is trading at 0.00 times its book value
  • Balance sheet holds net cash (cash exceeds total debt)
CONS
  • Earnings-based fair value is implausible (likely peak or one-off earnings) — the valuation model abstained from price levels
  • TTM EPS fell 24.8% year-over-year
✳ Pros and cons are machine-generated from the latest fundamentals and technicals.
EARNINGS QUALITY · we check the accounting so you don't have to
✓Operating cash flow is 54% of net income — profit is backed by real cash
Analysis as of 2026-09-25 · price live, fundamentals from latest filings
Congress Trading — last 90 days
See what senators are buying and selling on BRK-B. Sign in to unlock.
Sign in to view
📊 Options Flow — Put/Call Ratio

FAQ

Why is BRK-B rated Value?

BRK-B (BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC) is rated Value because the model combines fundamentals, price action, and earnings-quality checks. The current signal is Levels unreliable (peak earnings?) — verify manually. Attractive trailing P/E of 0.0× (earnings yield 18022.3%) and Stock is trading at 0.00 times its book value

Why are BRK-B's price levels hidden?

The model withheld price levels for BRK-B because the earnings anchor looks unreliable or incomplete. The page explicitly flags that the fair-value math should be verified manually.

What should I watch before acting on BRK-B?

Watch the trust score of 76, the earnings-quality checks, and any red flags. Earnings-based fair value is implausible (likely peak or one-off earnings) — the valuation model abstained from price levels and TTM EPS fell 24.8% year-over-year

Analyze another