2/2 left

MA stock verdict - Value

MA
Mastercard Incorporated
VALUEFinancial Services
$567.65 Levels unreliable (peak earnings?) — verify manually
⚠️ Earnings-multiple levels suppressed — the model fair value is implausibly far above the market price (likely cyclical-peak or one-off earnings). Judge this name manually.
VALUE100
GROWTH76
QUALITY66
TECHNICAL—
TRUST SCORE
90High
confidence in this read — data completeness, earnings quality & coverage
Technicals: insufficient price history
PROS
  • Attractive trailing P/E of 4.3× (earnings yield 23.4%)
  • Strong return on equity of 289.7% (TTM)
  • Revenue grew 13.8%/yr on average over the last 3 years
  • TTM EPS grew 18.9% year-over-year
  • Balance sheet holds net cash (cash exceeds total debt)
CONS
  • Earnings-based fair value is implausible (likely peak or one-off earnings) — the valuation model abstained from price levels
  • High leverage — debt-to-equity of 4.39
✳ Pros and cons are machine-generated from the latest fundamentals and technicals.
EARNINGS QUALITY · we check the accounting so you don't have to
✓Operating cash flow is 107% of net income — profit is backed by real cash
Analysis as of 2026-09-25 · price live, fundamentals from latest filings
Congress Trading — last 90 days
See what senators are buying and selling on MA. Sign in to unlock.
Sign in to view
📊 Options Flow — Put/Call Ratio

FAQ

Why is MA rated Value?

MA (Mastercard Incorporated) is rated Value because the model combines fundamentals, price action, and earnings-quality checks. The current signal is Levels unreliable (peak earnings?) — verify manually. Attractive trailing P/E of 4.3× (earnings yield 23.4%) and Strong return on equity of 289.7% (TTM)

Why are MA's price levels hidden?

The model withheld price levels for MA because the earnings anchor looks unreliable or incomplete. The page explicitly flags that the fair-value math should be verified manually.

What should I watch before acting on MA?

Watch the trust score of 90, the earnings-quality checks, and any red flags. Earnings-based fair value is implausible (likely peak or one-off earnings) — the valuation model abstained from price levels and High leverage — debt-to-equity of 4.39

Analyze another